Jenny McCarthy and Amanda Peet in Autism Clash
McCarthy won’t accept Peet’s apology for ‘parasite’ comment
By Matthew B. Zeidman
HOLLYWOOD, CA (Hollywood Today) 10/1/08 – Jenny McCarthy isn’t buying what Amanda Peet is selling. The former Playboy bunny has refused to accept actress Amanda Peet’s recent apology for calling parents of unvaccinated children “parasites,” blasting the “Saving Silverman” star’s continued urging of moms and dads not to keep their kids from the doctor’s needle.
“She has a lot of [nerve] to come forward and be on that side, because there is an angry mob on my side, and I like the fact that I can say she’s completely wrong,” McCarthy stated in this month’s issue of Spectrum magazine.
“…I still believe that the decision not to vaccinate our children bodes for a dangerous future,” Peet told Cookie magazine this summer, after apologizing for her “mean and divisive” comments made in a previous interview with the publication. “…It’s irresponsible to suggest that virtually the entire medical community and the CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) are behind a massive cover-up about vaccine safety.”
The clash between the two mothers was caused by the recent controversy surrounding the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine given to toddlers, as well as other childhood inoculations that also contain a mercury-based preservative, thiomersal.
McCarthy believes exposure to thiomersal, as well as too many vaccines at once, causes autism to emerge in some children, including her son, Evan—a viewpoint that was popularized following a 1998 study published in a British medical journal. Critics of the theory, including the AAP, have called the link between vaccines and autism tenuous and blamed the anti-vaccination trend for a resurgence of measles and other diseases.
Autism, a neurological affliction that can range from general social awkwardness to a complete inability to communicate and interact with others, currently affects approximately one in every 150 children, according to a 14-state survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2000 and 2002. While that number was an increase from past governmental statistics, it was unclear if the rise was due to a greater prevalence of the disorder or improved diagnostic methods.



