<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ABC Claims FCC Changed Indecency Standards with First Amendment Attack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/2008/02/12/abc-claims-fcc-changed-indecency-standards-with-first-amendment-attack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/2008/02/12/abc-claims-fcc-changed-indecency-standards-with-first-amendment-attack/</link>
	<description>Newsmagazine, with Attitude.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/2008/02/12/abc-claims-fcc-changed-indecency-standards-with-first-amendment-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-188624</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/?p=3816#comment-188624</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe someone is this desperately slutty. I feel sorry for the skank. This is why I&#039;m glad we do not have our antenna hooked up. Whoever she is and whoever watches this stuff is in need of some VERY serious mental help!!!! God Bless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe someone is this desperately slutty. I feel sorry for the skank. This is why I&#8217;m glad we do not have our antenna hooked up. Whoever she is and whoever watches this stuff is in need of some VERY serious mental help!!!! God Bless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William E. Canning</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/2008/02/12/abc-claims-fcc-changed-indecency-standards-with-first-amendment-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-183375</link>
		<dc:creator>William E. Canning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/?p=3816#comment-183375</guid>
		<description>Really?  True freedom of choice is letting self-important moralizers dictate permissible content?  

I&#039;m fascinated the Barbara Rice isn&#039;t a responsible enough parent to ensure that her children don&#039;t see naked buttocks or other &quot;offensive&quot; content.  If her children are young enough to have their minds warped, they should be tucked safely in bed, not watching NYPD Blue.

As to naked buttocks being &quot;ridiculously offensive&quot; to her, that&#039;s why we have *community* standards and it is my contention that most members of the American public are not offended by such a scene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?  True freedom of choice is letting self-important moralizers dictate permissible content?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m fascinated the Barbara Rice isn&#8217;t a responsible enough parent to ensure that her children don&#8217;t see naked buttocks or other &#8220;offensive&#8221; content.  If her children are young enough to have their minds warped, they should be tucked safely in bed, not watching NYPD Blue.</p>
<p>As to naked buttocks being &#8220;ridiculously offensive&#8221; to her, that&#8217;s why we have *community* standards and it is my contention that most members of the American public are not offended by such a scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/2008/02/12/abc-claims-fcc-changed-indecency-standards-with-first-amendment-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-182847</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/?p=3816#comment-182847</guid>
		<description>Frankly, this is why I now watch DVD&#039;s almost exclusively.  I simply don&#039;t want to be flicking through channels and run across something which is ridiculously offensive to me. Of what use is a pre-show warning when you may never see it?  This is not what I would choose to have myself or my children exposed to.  Please keep it in an environment where youe truly have to CHOOSE to see it.  That is true freedom of choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, this is why I now watch DVD&#8217;s almost exclusively.  I simply don&#8217;t want to be flicking through channels and run across something which is ridiculously offensive to me. Of what use is a pre-show warning when you may never see it?  This is not what I would choose to have myself or my children exposed to.  Please keep it in an environment where youe truly have to CHOOSE to see it.  That is true freedom of choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

